At the very heart of the Christian faith is the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity. This is a problem that is handled by the simple fact that Jesus didn't exist. No Jesus, no Christianity. Genius, no?
Sure, the vast majority of historians agree that a man named Jesus lived in Nazareth about two thousand years ago and had twelve apostles and many followers and founded Christianity, and it is true that this is supported by massive amounts of evidence from scholars of the past, but these scholars overlook some very simple facts (probably because of subjective bias):
1. Coincidence. How do we know that this Jesus who did everything that is told in the Bible is the same Jesus from history? Simple: We don't. Therefore, the Jesus depicted in history is simply in the right place at the right time, and completed all the things the Biblical Jesus completed.
2. Conspiracies. The Catholic church was a big hit back then, and everybody knows that they made up their information, so they probably made up Jesus as well. They just took the Bible and scribbled in some stuff about a guy named Jesus, so that their influence would grow and they could rule the world. It is also possible that the Apostles (of the man who didn't exist) simply spread some stories about a guy doing great things, and, since people in ancient times were gullible, stupid morons, everybody blindly believed them.
3. The many scholars that are quoted talking of a historical Jesus, such as Tacitus and Josephus, lived after Jesus supposedly existed. It is a widely known fact that history cannot be written in hindsight, therefore, those historians are all false. We don't even know where they got their info from; Probably the Church, which was engaged in their mad conspiracy at the time.
4. Nobody wrote about this "Jesus" during his lifetime. Sure, only about 10% of the population knew how to read and write, but you'd think they'd learn for somebody as big as Jesus was supposed to be.
Jesus was an obvious myth, as this irrefutable proof shows.
7 comments:
"Jesus didn't exist!"...You fucking, moron. No historian acknowledges the "Jesus Myth" theory..It's like denying the moon existed 2,000 + years ago, holds about as much weight as water in a collander and you make Atheists and Agnostics look incredibly, stupid by even bringing up the topic. If you are going to make the claim that the Jesus in the Bible is not the same Jesus from the Bible (which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard)..you need a massive amount of evidence to support such b.s. other than "because I said so."
Oh, crap..forgive me..it appears the "Catholic church was a big, hit back then"..is a PERFECT reason to come to such a conclusion.
Pffftt..you've got to be kidding me??
Every respectable scholar knows Jesus never existed. If you want to see for yourself, then go ahead and just buy my book. Go ahead, I dare you.
Listen, I don't know where the Hell you got that informaton, but no "scholar" denies that Jesus existed. Most deny his divinity, but not his existence. The only people who buy that bullshit are the stupid, Youtube Atheists like Chadagg and Goat. I'm an Agnostic, and I'm asking you to please re-write this site before anyone else sees it because you sound like some kind of retard.
Do you have a PhD equivalent in philosophy and did you ever major under Christian apologist Dr. William Lane Craig? I didn't think so.
And there's no reason to re-write this site, we have a sister site here:
http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com
You do know Sara that this blog is a parody of an atheist on theologyweb.com and his blog, right?
I am the on ewho wrote this article
Sara: This blog and it's contributors are parodying another blog on this website, titled debunkingchristianity. We are not atheists. But I'm glad my posts can be pretty convincing.
;)
Post a Comment